Real World meets LJSpace
Jan. 30th, 2004 10:58 pmA friend of mine came up at square dancing and said, "You know, I saw your blog!" I said okay, so what? He said "Well, you were so... revealing!"
Hmm. There's nothing I put up here that I wouldn't happily recount to most of my friends and acquaintances, if there were time and places for that much discussion. If you publish truthful accounts of what has or is happening to you, it is only embarrassing if you have to admit something you're ashamed of. I'm ashamed of very little, and I certainly wouldn't put those stories here.
I do worry a bit about people who discuss their jobs and politics when they still depend on the goodwill of others for their livelihoods. Corporate life being full of cutthroat and petty politics, giving those who might want to hurt you for their own advantage ammunition to do so seems unwise. But privacy per se is really overrated -- what we want is to be more open with people who wish us well, and keep from those who wish us ill any more information about us than is necessary.
The other problem that's come up is that people I mention will sometimes get in a huff over the slightest author's license taken. It's often better for purposes of storytelling to simplify some details and not get bogged down in legalistic perfection. I have a point of view about things, and I'm not above emphasizing some details over others to make my point. So sue me.
Hmm. There's nothing I put up here that I wouldn't happily recount to most of my friends and acquaintances, if there were time and places for that much discussion. If you publish truthful accounts of what has or is happening to you, it is only embarrassing if you have to admit something you're ashamed of. I'm ashamed of very little, and I certainly wouldn't put those stories here.
I do worry a bit about people who discuss their jobs and politics when they still depend on the goodwill of others for their livelihoods. Corporate life being full of cutthroat and petty politics, giving those who might want to hurt you for their own advantage ammunition to do so seems unwise. But privacy per se is really overrated -- what we want is to be more open with people who wish us well, and keep from those who wish us ill any more information about us than is necessary.
The other problem that's come up is that people I mention will sometimes get in a huff over the slightest author's license taken. It's often better for purposes of storytelling to simplify some details and not get bogged down in legalistic perfection. I have a point of view about things, and I'm not above emphasizing some details over others to make my point. So sue me.
Re:
Date: 2004-01-31 12:00 am (UTC)I'm not thinking of myself -- I have little to lose. But no one is completely free, and the more embedded you are in a career and dependent on your bosses, the less freedom you have to be yourself. Success in such an environment is partly dependent on managing your image with those who have power over you. A few indiscreet words about partying, drug use, travel while you called in sick, etc., are enough to make you look like a less than reliable person for that next promotion. Not everyone can be themselves -- even if you come out as gay (which is okay in most corporate environments now) you're better off taking care to avoid being tagged as addictive, depressed, ethically challenged, obsessive, or likely to spend more than half your work time blogging.
Everyone should remember that documents on the web will last forever in the archives being built today. Google already reveals more about some people than they'd like, and in 20 years the ability to dredge up page after page of youthful indiscretions about job candidates could be in widespread use by employers. Avoiding this now is fairly easy -- use a pseudonym and alternate email -- but that won't work for much longer.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-31 09:51 am (UTC)Yeah, I keep reminding myself of this. I suspect that a lot of bloggers don't intimately comprehend this yet.