This article discusses those sweet, caffeinated smoothies Starbucks sells, and their desire to sell them to kids without appearing to market to children directly. They are introducing Frappucino™ juice blends; I don't see nutritional info on the new drinks on their web site, but they are probably even worse than the existing Frappucinos, which typically have more than 400 calories of (mostly) sugar (80 g carbs) for a 16-oz serving. This is a sugar bomb -- drinking one of these will spike your blood sugar, leading to more fat deposition followed by a carb-craving coma.Note that Jamba Juice-ish smoothies are almost as bad, usually having 200+ calories of sugar in the same 16 oz. format. But juicing fruit lets the liquid sugars enter your bloodstream quickly, whereas fruit itself slowly releases its nutritional value as the cell walls break down in your digestive system, which is much better.
I'm not suggesting (as surely some will) that some government should step in to protect children (or anyone else) from unhealthy processed foods. But the constant advertising of fruit juice as something healthy misleads people into thinking they are choosing wisely when they pick up one of these. It's not unusual for people to have several of these concoctions a week. Then they wonder why they can't stop gaining weight....
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:00 pm (UTC)When I became diabetic, my nutritional counselor told me to view juice as candy.
If anyone local is having troubles with nutrition, I fully endorse "Lite for Life" on 26th, in Noe Valley. Smart, educated people.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:06 pm (UTC)It is scary, all these fast food solutions, and no one realizes how many calories they cover.
Myself, I have been on a strict 2000 calorie diet for two months now. I've lost a grand total of 8 lbs. *grumble, grumble*
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:45 pm (UTC)*grumble*
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:18 pm (UTC)Seriously. I'll stick to black coffee. Which means Timmy's, not Bucky's, for smoothness and no bitterness.
I'm bitter enough.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 08:01 pm (UTC)I learned with my reactive hypoglycemia to never eat anything with more than a trace of carbs. If I do indulge it is always part of a high protein meal. My blood sugar seldom goes below normal now and I lose weight because I don't get hungry.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 12:38 am (UTC)The other problem with high gL food, aside from the peaks and valleys, is that eating that way trains your brain about how to get it's glucose fix.
I also will add, for those who still drink, that alcohol totally inhibits your liver's ability to produce glucose for 2 or 3 DAYS(!!) which means that the brain has to crave sugar to get fed. YIKES.
Personally, I am thinking of going on the crack-ho diet.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 01:58 am (UTC)I never knew that about drinking. Just makes me glad I never caught on to it.
Who knows what crack does for it. I don't want to think.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 02:46 am (UTC)BTW, heard your parents haven't been too well of late. I hope they are doing better and give them my regards.