Why is that the people with the least understanding of complex legal and financial matters feel they must shout their uninformed opinions to the world? Do they think outrage about things that are none of their business will produce wise, intelligent action? Why do they buy their opinions wholesale from web sites that reinforce their prejudices and then try to pass them off as their own? And why do I try to correct/explain/educate? "tis a puzzlement. The memes rule.
Profile
drscott
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-05-11 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-11 03:02 pm (UTC)Yes, it's lunch time down here. ;)
Sure, in the past you could always get a pre-fab opinion from the op-ed pages -- but you had to actually take the trouble to read them, and people who read op-ed pages also have a tendency to do at least some of their own political thinking. But now that we have multiple channels of yammering pundits, it's easy to check your brain at the door and go along with whichever pundit's view gives you the warm fuzzies. Easy, fast, fun, and none of that tedious researching of background issues yourself!
You try to educate because it pains you to hear claptrap passed off as serious, thoughtful commentary. Unfortunately, these days trying to refute said claptrap quickly becomes a daunting task. King Canute would understand.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-11 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-11 03:57 pm (UTC)I will endeavor to save my energy for a more formal mass medium where it may at least do some good.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-11 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-11 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-12 01:49 pm (UTC)Certainly the former Enron employees have a different point of view than their former CEOs.
Big hugs!