It's never been quite clear whether LJ was an open-source not-for-profit community or a business. I guess it was / is both. This kind of change is usually bad, since at some point the buyers (eventually a Yahoo or Google or *choke* MSN) want to milk the users through advertising or cross-selling.
Well, LJ and MT/TP are two different technologies-both have good points and bad. If the LJ people want to sell their system and SixApart winds up creating a "profit" scheme, I would suspect there would be some changes in how LJ handles the paid and permanent users as well as free users- advertising sounds like the first step, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-04 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-04 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-04 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-05 09:23 am (UTC)