[personal profile] drscott
... and the stalled cap-and-trade bill, rammed through the House with armtwisting and giveways to polluters, is shown to be very costly.

Now economists would tell you (and did try to tell everyone) that a cap-and-trade approach would be subject to political gaming. Which is why Congress picked it, since horsetrading is how they gather campaign contributions -- pay-to-play, give us money or we'll neglect your interests. The House ended up giving away most of the revenues to favored industries and limiting the cost signals required to reduce emissions.

I can tell you how to get the most improvement in greenhouse gas emissions at least cost -- a carbon tax, announced now at zero, to rise slowly over decades. This allows people and businesses to plan to avoid the cost of it without actually putting much of a drag on the economy. But a simple and fair system doesn't allow politicians to extract maximum leverage from it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

drscott

November 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 21st, 2026 02:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios